The name Abudu Yauza Inussah also referred to simply as Yauzza has surfaced repeatedly in court documents and evidence related to the ongoing custody case of a young girl, Kim Lena-Maria Hori. Allegations describe him as a hostile figure who has engaged in harassment, intimidation, and threats directed at Kim’s father, Steven Hori, with potential repercussions for the child’s safety.

This article examines who Abudu Yauza Inussah is, the nature of the accusations against him, and why his presence in this case raises serious questions about the protection of children in high-conflict family disputes.

Background of the Case

On June 23, 2025, Mr. Hori submitted an official motion to the Krynychanskyi District Court of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. In this filing, he included Appendix 7: “Evidence of harassment and intimidation by a third party Yauza”. This appendix contains screenshots and translations of direct messages from Abudu Yauza Inussah, evidencing threats, insults, and attempts to destabilize Mr. Hori.

The court motion also accuses Mrs. Tetiana Hrushka, the maternal grandmother of Kim, of deliberately exposing the child to Inussah, despite knowing his history of hostility. Evidence suggests that Hrushka even transmitted Mr. Hori’s private phone number to Inussah, an act characterized as reckless and provocative.

Evidence of Harassment

The documented messages attributed to Inussah reveal a pattern of targeted harassment:

• Accusations blaming Mr. Hori for his late wife’s death.
• Insults attacking his integrity and dignity, such as:

“You are nothing more than a dishonest person and an imbecile. I will make sure that you are fired from your job.”

• Pressure to abandon legal proceedings, with statements suggesting that continuing the custody case is pointless.

Such messages go beyond personal opinion; they are coercive tactics designed to intimidate and silence.

Risks to Child Safety

At the center of this case is a child, Kim, who is allegedly being exposed to Abudu Yauza Inussah through the decisions of her grandmother. Child protection principles are clear: any adult with a history of threats or hostility toward a parent should not have proximity to the child. Exposure creates a climate of fear, confusion, and instability that can cause long-term harm.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes the right of every child to be protected from violence and intimidation. By allegedly maintaining contact between Kim and Inussah, the grandmother may be violating this principle.

The appeal for witnesses remains urgent. Every piece of information could help prevent harm and restore safety to a vulnerable child.

Note: This article summarizes allegations contained in court filings that are under judicial review.